Abstract

Poverty is one of the most important determinants of adverse health outcomes globally, a major cause of societal instability and one of the largest causes of lost human potential. Traditional approaches to measuring and targeting poverty rely heavily on census data, which in most low- and middle-income countries (LMICs) are unavailable or out-of-date. Alternate measures are needed to complement and update estimates between censuses. This study demonstrates how public and private data sources that are commonly available for LMICs can be used to provide novel insight into the spatial distribution of poverty. We evaluate the relative value of modelling three traditional poverty measures using aggregate data from mobile operators and widely available geospatial data. Taken together, models combining these data sources provide the best predictive power (highest r2 = 0.78) and lowest error, but generally models employing mobile data only yield comparable results, offering the potential to measure poverty more frequently and at finer granularity. Stratifying models into urban and rural areas highlights the advantage of using mobile data in urban areas and different data in different contexts. The findings indicate the possibility to estimate and continually monitor poverty rates at high spatial resolution in countries with limited capacity to support traditional methods of data collection.

Highlights

  • In 2015, approximately 700 million people lived in extreme poverty [1]

  • We find that explicitly modelling the spatial covariance in the data was critically important. This resulted in improved predictions, lower error and better measures of fit based on cross-validation and the deviance information criteria (DIC), a hierarchical modelling generalization of the Akaike’s information criterion (AIC) [62]

  • We find strong correlations (r 1⁄4 20.91 and 20.86 for the Wealth Index (WI); 0.99 and 0.97 for the PPI; and 20.96 and 20.94 for income, respectively, p, 0.001 for all models) between our upazila predictions and earlier estimates of poverty derived from Small area estimation (SAE) techniques based on data from the 2010 Household Income and Expenditure (HIES) survey and 2011 census [64]

Read more

Summary

Introduction

In 2015, approximately 700 million people lived in extreme poverty [1]. Poverty is a major determinant of adverse health outcomes including child mortality [2], and contributes to population growth [3], societal instability and conflict [4]. Eradicating poverty in all its forms remains a major challenge and the first target of the Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs) [5]. It is crucial that information is available on where affected people live. Such data improve the understanding of the causes of poverty, enable improved allocation of resources for poverty alleviation programmes, and are a critical.

Methods
Results
Conclusion
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call