Abstract

Economics has been trying to understand market functioning for a long time. However, the neoclassical approach does not satisfy the understanding of the mechanisms that operate in the construction, stabilization, and transformation of markets. For this reason, economic sociology proposes to provide subsidies from causal pluralism, rejecting explanatory theories of purely rational choices. Therefore, the use of sociological theories in the understanding of agri-food markets is also necessary. In this sense, this work aimed to compare the market for agri-food products with a geographical indication (GI) between the European Union (EU) and Mercosur, based on the performance of brands and supermarkets in both regions. For this, we used a data survey of thousands of products and respective GI registrations in the most prominent online markets of countries in both regions. We applied analyses that differentiated the economic blocs and used field theory to explain the phenomena found in the findings. The results indicated the formation of relevant bands in the GI market, a little voluminous, but capable of crossing borders, a second, with the majority of GIs found that are only commercialized locally, and a third invisible, where most products are located, which do not exist in these markets. Furthermore, supermarkets’ own brands have great relevance and are decisive in building the market.

Highlights

  • Markets have been studied more deeply since the 18th century

  • Despite the relevant contributions on market functioning, the rules of exchange and the general parameters of supply and demand of neoclassical economics, this paper focuses on the economic sociology approach to bring new information and analysis on the market imperfections that break these rules

  • This paper develops under the neo-institutionalist frame to understand the difference of mechanics of Mercosur and the European Union (EU) geographical indication (GI) market

Read more

Summary

Introduction

Markets have been studied more deeply since the 18th century. The agri-food market is one of the firsts. To better understand the construction and the rules of the market, many economists, sociologists, and social scientists have worked on theories and observations of empirical facts. Say theorized the law of markets, which addressed the creation of demand through the production of goods and value creation as a defense of the laissez-faire idea for the capitalist economy [1]. The study of markets has taken new and different directions. Despite the relevant contributions on market functioning, the rules of exchange and the general parameters of supply and demand of neoclassical economics, this paper focuses on the economic sociology approach to bring new information and analysis on the market imperfections that break these rules

Objectives
Methods
Results
Conclusion
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call