Abstract

Abstract. The Super Dual Auroral Radar Network (SuperDARN) network of HF coherent backscatter radars form a unique global diagnostic of large-scale ionospheric and magnetospheric dynamics in the Northern and Southern Hemispheres. Currently the ground projections of the HF radar returns are routinely determined by a simple rangefinding algorithm, which takes no account of the prevailing, or indeed the average, HF propagation conditions. This is in spite of the fact that both direct E- and F-region backscatter and 1½-hop E- and F-region backscatter are commonly used in geophysical interpretation of the data. In a companion paper, Chisham et al. (2008) have suggested a new virtual height model for SuperDARN, based on average measured propagation paths. Over shorter propagation paths the existing rangefinding algorithm is adequate, but mapping errors become significant for longer paths where the roundness of the Earth becomes important, and a correct assumption of virtual height becomes more difficult. The SuperDARN radar at Hankasalmi has a propagation path to high power HF ionospheric modification facilities at both Tromsø on a ½-hop path and SPEAR on a 1½-hop path. The SuperDARN radar at Þykkvibǽr has propagation paths to both facilities over 1½-hop paths. These paths provide an opportunity to quantitatively test the available SuperDARN virtual height models. It is also possible to use HF radar backscatter which has been artificially induced by the ionospheric heaters as an accurate calibration point for the Hankasalmi elevation angle of arrival data, providing a range correction algorithm for the SuperDARN radars which directly uses elevation angle. These developments enable the accurate mappings of the SuperDARN electric field measurements which are required for the growing number of multi-instrument studies of the Earth's ionosphere and magnetosphere.

Highlights

  • The Super Dual Auroral Radar Network (SuperDARN) network (Greenwald et al, 1995; Chisham et al, 2007) currently consists of 11 over-the-horizon HF radars in the northern polar regions and 7 radars in the southern polar regions. Radars of this design have been in operation since the early 1980s, and currently form a powerful diagnostic of large-scale ionospheric and magnetospheric dynamics in the Northern and Southern Hemispheres

  • The radar systems rely on the refraction of the HF radiation both in order to achieve orthogonality to the Earth’s magnetic field, a requirement for scattering off the ionospheric irregularities, which form the targets for such radar systems, and to achieve backscatter from the longer ranges, which require over-the-horizon operations

  • -hop paths with elevation angles in the range 10◦–30◦ for SuperDARN data recorded at ranges 1500–2500 km, where reliable elevation angle data exist

Read more

Summary

Introduction

The Super Dual Auroral Radar Network (SuperDARN) network (Greenwald et al, 1995; Chisham et al, 2007) currently consists of 11 over-the-horizon HF radars in the northern polar regions and 7 radars in the southern polar regions. Yeoman et al (2001) performed a preliminary evaluation of the absolute rangefinding accuracy of current routine analysis of the SuperDARN network of over-the-horizon HF radars comparing the ground range, calculated group path and measured radar slant range of backscatter artificially excited by the EISCAT heating facility at Tromsø. The location of the artificial irregularities is determined through the combination of the beam direction of the high power RF facilities and the ionospheric interaction height of the RF beam, as determined from collocated incoherent scatter radar measurements of the modified ionosphere These propagation paths provide an opportunity to quantitatively test the available SuperDARN virtual height models as presented in Chisham et al (2008) and highlight significant issues with the accuracy of the standard Super-. -hop paths with elevation angles in the range 10◦–30◦ for SuperDARN data recorded at ranges 1500–2500 km, where reliable elevation angle data exist

Instrumentation
Observations
Evaluating the effect of virtual height models on rangefinding accuracy
Elevation angle effects on rangefinding accuracy
Discussion
60 SPEAR range gate vs elevation angle
Findings
Summary
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call