Abstract

Histological brain slices are widely used in neuroscience to study the anatomical organization of neural circuits. Systematic and accurate comparisons of anatomical data from multiple brains, especially from different studies, can benefit tremendously from registering histological slices onto a common reference atlas. Most existing methods rely on an initial reconstruction of the volume before registering it to a reference atlas. Because these slices are prone to distortions during the sectioning process and often sectioned with non-standard angles, reconstruction is challenging and often inaccurate. Here we describe a framework that maps each slice to its corresponding plane in the Allen Mouse Brain Atlas (2015) to build a plane-wise mapping and then perform 2D nonrigid registration to build a pixel-wise mapping. We use the L2 norm of the histogram of oriented gradients difference of two patches as the similarity metric for both steps and a Markov random field formulation that incorporates tissue coherency to compute the nonrigid registration. To fix significantly distorted regions that are misshaped or much smaller than the control grids, we train a context-aggregation network to segment and warp them to their corresponding regions with thin plate spline. We have shown that our method generates results comparable to an expert neuroscientist and is significantly better than reconstruction-first approaches. Code and sample dataset are available at sites.google.com/view/brain-mapping.

Highlights

  • Neuroanatomical studies have traditionally been performed in histological sections, followed by manually annotating data based on histological stains in comparison with a brain atlas

  • We introduce a method to register a sequence of coronal histological sections of mouse brain to the grayscale Nissl volume of the Allen Mouse Brain Atlas (2015) (ABA) (Lein et al, 2007; Allen, 2015) by first identifying the matching sectioning plane in the atlas volume for each slice and performing 2D nonrigid registration

  • We find that the L2 norm of histogram of oriented gradients (HOG) (Dalal and Triggs, 2005) difference suits histological slice properties better

Read more

Summary

Introduction

Neuroanatomical studies have traditionally been performed in histological sections, followed by manually annotating data based on histological stains in comparison with a brain atlas. It is crucial to standardize and digitalize anatomical information to allow data from multiple brains to be compared in the same reference brain. To this end, detailed anatomical brain reference atlases have been established for both human and animal model studies (Lein et al, 2007; Hawrylycz et al, 2012; Bakker et al, 2015; Tiesinga et al, 2015). All experimental brain images would be automatically registered to an anatomical reference volume, creating a platform for the comparison and integration of results from different experiments. Registering laboratory histological images to an atlas is still challenging in terms of accuracy, universality, and time-efficiency. One of the major issues is that brain histological data sets often suffer from

Objectives
Methods
Results
Conclusion
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call