Abstract
The transport of dissolved minerals and groundwater flow plays a crucial role in the ecosystem of many wetlands. Nonetheless, installing equipment to monitor groundwater seepage is invasive, harms vegetation, and can impact biodiversity. By remotely mapping surface temperature in late summer, when there is the greatest difference between warm soil and cold groundwater, temperature patterns can expose areas with the greatest upward gradient and flow. The conventional method of using tensiometers to measure hydraulic gradient and estimate flux using Darcy’s law was applied and compared with thermal imaging to characterize groundwater seepage at two contrasting sites within a central North Dakota fen (groundwater discharge wetland). Both sites exhibited variable gradients between the shallow and deep tensiometers. The temperature trend determined from the thermal imaging showed a closer relationship to the measured hydraulic gradients at the herbaceous (Sedge) site than at the wooded (Willow) site. Saturated hydraulic conductivity K ranged from 6 × 10−5 to 2 × 10−4 m/s for the Willow site; and 6 × 10−6 to 1 × 10−4 m/s for Sedge site. The flux calculated for the Willow site ranged from 1.4 × 10−5 to 2.7 × 10−4 m/s and that of the Sedge site ranged from 2.2 × 10−6 to 6.3 × 10−5 m/s. The gradients are affected at shallow depth because of heterogeneous soil stratigraphy, which is likely the reason that seepage faces at the sites cannot be mapped solely by thermal imaging.
Highlights
IntroductionHeat has been identified and used as a groundwater tracer [14]
Heat information offers the possibility to detect the movement of groundwater, and location of discharge, and the distribution of groundwater flow that transitions to surface water [3,13,19]
This study aimed at using temperature differential between the surface water and the groundwater in midsummer and midwinter to characterize seepage
Summary
Heat has been identified and used as a groundwater tracer [14]. Heat carried by groundwater has been used as a tracer to identify surface water infiltration [3,14], indicate seepage dynamics, and zones of groundwater seepage [3]. Many studies [3,5,14,18] have used heat as a groundwater tracer to study the flow system, flow direction, and recharge and discharge, and potentially characterizing groundwater dynamics. Heat information offers the possibility to detect the movement of groundwater, and location of discharge, and the distribution of groundwater flow that transitions to surface water [3,13,19]
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.