Abstract

Functional brain networks are shaped and constrained by the underlying structural network. However, functional networks are not merely a one-to-one reflection of the structural network. Several theories have been put forward to understand the relationship between structural and functional networks. However, it remains unclear how these theories can be unified. Two existing recent theories state that 1) functional networks can be explained by all possible walks in the structural network, which we will refer to as the series expansion approach, and 2) functional networks can be explained by a weighted combination of the eigenmodes of the structural network, the so-called eigenmode approach. To elucidate the unique or common explanatory power of these approaches to estimate functional networks from the structural network, we analysed the relationship between these two existing views. Using linear algebra, we first show that the eigenmode approach can be written in terms of the series expansion approach, i.e., walks on the structural network associated with different hop counts correspond to different weightings of the eigenvectors of this network. Second, we provide explicit expressions for the coefficients for both the eigenmode and series expansion approach. These theoretical results were verified by empirical data from Diffusion Tensor Imaging (DTI) and functional Magnetic Resonance Imaging (fMRI), demonstrating a strong correlation between the mappings based on both approaches. Third, we analytically and empirically demonstrate that the fit of the eigenmode approach to measured functional data is always at least as good as the fit of the series expansion approach, and that errors in the structural data lead to large errors of the estimated coefficients for the series expansion approach. Therefore, we argue that the eigenmode approach should be preferred over the series expansion approach. Results hold for eigenmodes of the weighted adjacency matrices as well as eigenmodes of the graph Laplacian. ​Taken together, these results provide an important step towards unification of existing theories regarding the structure-function relationships in brain networks.

Highlights

  • For many years, structural and functional brain networks have been studied independently (Bullmore and Sporns, 2012; Sotiropoulos et al, 2013), revealing partly overlapping and partly divergent connectivity patterns

  • Two existing recent theories state that 1) functional networks can be explained by all possible walks in the structural network, which we will refer to as the series expansion approach, and 2) functional networks can be explained by a weighted combination of the eigenmodes of the structural network, the so-called eigenmode approach

  • We first show that the eigenmode approach can be written in terms of the series expansion approach, i.e., walks on the structural network associated with different hop counts correspond to different weightings of the eigenvectors of this network

Read more

Summary

Introduction

Structural and functional brain networks have been studied independently (Bullmore and Sporns, 2012; Sotiropoulos et al, 2013), revealing partly overlapping and partly divergent connectivity patterns. Recent years have seen a wealth of explorations by several independent groups of the eigenmode approach, in which eigenvectors of the structural network are believed to form a basis-set to explain functional networks (Atasoy et al, 2016; Robinson et al, 2016; Wang et al, 2017; Tewarie et al, 2019; Abdelnour et al, 2018; Gabay et al, 2018). The author demonstrated that the series approach can be formulated in terms of the spectral approach, and demonstrated the same mapping between structural and functional brain networks for the topological and spectral domain We take this notion further, we first illustrate a theoretical link between the eigenmode and series expansion approach model coefficients. We analyse whether eigenvectors of the structural and functional networks in empirical data are similar

Theoretical link between series expansion and eigenmode approaches
Common eigenvectors between structural and functional brain networks
CCCCA: λd1 λd1
Numerical errors for the series expansion approach
Comparing the eigenmode and series expansion approach
Application of both approaches to empirical and simulated networks
Discussion
Proof of Lemma 1
Proof of Lemma 2
Proof of Lemma 3
A: λd1
Processing pipeline fMRI data for dataset 4
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call