Abstract

BackgroundAccording to the UK’s Office for National Statistics, England and Wales reported a 2.9% increase in sexual aggression cases (3.4 million females and 631,000 males) between 2009 and 2019. In Scotland, sexual aggression cases increased by 66%, with 40% of these sexual violations being perpetrated on individuals under the age of 18 years, while incidents relating to sexual misconduct in Northern Ireland increased by 21.0%, with only 41.2% of those cases being prosecuted. Acts of sexual aggression can have physical, emotional and mental consequences which predispose young people to subsequent short- and long-term mental and social disorders and comorbidities. Such consequences include feelings of guilt, shame, anger, experiencing post-traumatic stress disorders, antisocial behaviour, alcohol and drug misuse and dependency, confusion surrounding sexuality and sexually transmitted illnesses including the human immuno-deficiency virus. However, despite the societal, health, economic and educational implications for young people in the UK and increasing statistics, few studies address this scourge. Hence, the objective is to systematically map evidence of young people’s experiences of sexual aggression in the UK and identify literature gaps that could inform future research.MethodsThe included literature for this scoping review is published peer-reviewed articles of all research designs; grey literature including governmental reports, policy statements, conference and media reports; and unpublished theses. Electronic searches of databases and search engines such as Embase, Google, Google Scholar, EBSCOhost, CINAHL, PubMed, Education Resources Information Centre (ERIC), PsycInfo, World Health Organization (WHO), media organizations, governmental and education departments and higher learning websites for published literature. Additional searches will include screening citations in reference lists of articles and perusing “Cited by” logs. All retrieved literature will be exported to an Endnote X9.2 library. Duplicate documents will be deleted prior to title screening commencing. An adapted Mixed Method Appraisal Tool (MMAT) will be independently used by two reviewers to ensure a rigorous study and quality assessment of all included studies.DiscussionThis scoping review employs a mixed-method approach to map and select relevant literature and summarize and report on young people’s experiences of sexual aggression in the UK. Once the data is summarized, it could inform planning and policy pertaining to a safe and effective sexual health curriculum for all young people, assist with the development of effective strategies to reduce sexual aggression and guide future research.

Highlights

  • According to the United Kingdom (UK)’s Office for National Statistics, England and Wales reported a 2.9% increase in sexual aggression cases (3.4 million females and 631,000 males) between 2009 and 2019

  • Cases relating to sexual aggression in Scotland had increased by 66% with 40% of the sexual violations perpetrated on victims under the age of 18 [10], while cases relating to sexual misconduct in Northern Ireland had increased by 21.0%, only 41.2% of those cases were being prosecuted with 55.9% of the remaining cases not recommended for prosecution [11]

  • Sexual aggression transgresses young people’s human rights with social, educational, physical, health and psychological short and long-term consequences [36]. Despite this global human rights travesty and evidence indicating that sexual aggression among youth is a serious problem within the UK, to our knowledge, there is no overview of the evidence on this issue within the UK [37,38,39]

Read more

Summary

Methods

Breadth and extent of literature relating to a broad spectrum of literature including various types of evidence on sexual aggression in young people living in the UK, we chose a scoping review over other information synthesis methodologies [27]. Eligibility criteria The Population, Concept, Context (PCC) framework (Table 1) will determine the eligibility of studies that address the research question and guide the selection process [30] Identifying relevant studies This scoping review will include all study designs including qualitative, quantitative and mixed methods; interrupted time-series; randomized and non-randomized controlled and uncontrolled trials; before and after, analytical cross-sectional and observational studies inclusive of case-control and prospective and retrospective cohort studies published in peer-reviewed journals. Charting of data A data charting form was created using a Google form which will be populated with relevant information extracted from each included source of evidence This process will be piloted by two assessors (DMM and SMN) to ensure that the data extracted is relevant and answers the research question and addresses the eligibility criteria. Two screeners (JR, DMM) will appraise all the included sources of evidence

Discussion
Background
Findings
Limitations
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call