Abstract

BackgroundDNA methylation is an important tissue-specific epigenetic event that influences transcriptional regulation of gene expression. Differentially methylated CpG sites may act as mediators between genetic variation and gene expression, and this relationship can be exploited while mapping multi-tissue expression quantitative trait loci (eQTL). Current multi-tissue eQTL mapping techniques are limited to only exploiting gene expression patterns across multiple tissues either in a joint tissue or tissue-by-tissue frameworks. We present a new statistical approach that enables us to model the effect of germ-line variation on tissue-specific gene expression in the presence of effects due to DNA methylation.ResultsOur method efficiently models genetic and epigenetic variation to identify genomic regions of interest containing combinations of mRNA transcripts, CpG sites, and SNPs by jointly testing for genotypic effect and higher order interaction effects between genotype, methylation and tissues. We demonstrate using Monte Carlo simulations that our approach, in the presence of both genetic and DNA methylation effects, gives an improved performance (in terms of statistical power) to detect eQTLs over the current eQTL mapping approaches. When applied to an array-based dataset from 150 neuropathologically normal adult human brains, our method identifies eQTLs that were undetected using standard tissue-by-tissue or joint tissue eQTL mapping techniques. As an example, our method identifies eQTLs by leveraging methylated CpG sites in a LIM homeobox member gene (LHX9), which may have a role in the neural development.ConclusionsOur score test-based approach does not need parameter estimation under the alternative hypothesis. As a result, our model parameters are estimated only once for each mRNA - CpG pair. Our model specifically studies the effects of non-coding regions of DNA (in this case, CpG sites) on mapping eQTLs. However, we can easily model micro-RNAs instead of CpG sites to study the effects of post-transcriptional events in mapping eQTL. Our model’s flexible framework also allows us to investigate other genomic events such as alternative gene splicing by extending our model to include gene isoform-specific data.

Highlights

  • DNA methylation is an important tissue-specific epigenetic event that influences transcriptional regulation of gene expression

  • Previous studies have shown that inter-individual variation in DNA methylation at distinct CpG sites has been consistently linked to genetic variation such as single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs), known as methylation expression quantitative trait loci (eQTL)

  • We demonstrate the effectiveness of our method by applying it to a publicly available expression, methylation and SNP array datasets from normal adult human brains [4] and show that by jointly analyzing multiple brain regions, we identify eQTLs that may otherwise be not identified by multi-tissue eQTL methods

Read more

Summary

Introduction

DNA methylation is an important tissue-specific epigenetic event that influences transcriptional regulation of gene expression. Methylated CpG sites may act as mediators between genetic variation and gene expression, and this relationship can be exploited while mapping multi-tissue expression quantitative trait loci (eQTL). It has been long established that regulatory regions in higher eukaryotes activate gene transcription in a tissue-specific manner [1, 2]. These regulatory regions, which affect the binding affinities of transcription factors, are susceptible to both genetic variation and epigenetic modifications that play a coordinated role in regulating tissue-specific gene expression [3,4,5,6,7]. DNA methylation is linked to transcriptional silencing, and many CpG island promoters are active in a tissue-specific manner. Since an increased DNA methylation at any of the distinct CpG sites located in the promoter regions necessitate chromatin remodeling and subsequent decrease in gene expression, any DNA sequence variation within the CpG-rich regions that disrupts the methylation process may have an opposite effect on gene expression

Methods
Results
Conclusion
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call