Abstract

Chinese medical entities have not been organized comprehensively due to the lack of well-developed terminology systems, which poses a challenge to processing Chinese medical texts for fine-grained medical knowledge representation. To unify Chinese medical terminologies, mapping Chinese medical entities to their English counterparts in the Unified Medical Language System (UMLS) is an efficient solution. However, their mappings have not been investigated sufficiently in former research. In this study, we explore strategies for mapping Chinese medical entities to the UMLS and systematically evaluate the mapping performance. First, Chinese medical entities are translated to English using multiple web-based translation engines. Then, 3 mapping strategies are investigated: (a) string-based, (b) semantic-based, and (c) string and semantic similarity combined. In addition, cross-lingual pretrained language models are applied to map Chinese medical entities to UMLS concepts without translation. All of these strategies are evaluated on the ICD10-CN, Chinese Human Phenotype Ontology (CHPO), and RealWorld datasets. The linear combination method based on the SapBERT and term frequency-inverse document frequency bag-of-words models perform the best on all evaluation datasets, with 91.85%, 82.44%, and 78.43% of the top 5 accuracies on the ICD10-CN, CHPO, and RealWorld datasets, respectively. In our study, we explore strategies for mapping Chinese medical entities to the UMLS and identify a satisfactory linear combination method. Our investigation will facilitate Chinese medical entity normalization and inspire research that focuses on Chinese medical ontology development.

Full Text
Paper version not known

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.