Abstract
This article, which is a report of the Campaign Discourse Mapping Project, draws on the speeches, ads, and news of the 1960, 1980, 1988, 1992, and 1996 campaigns to debunk three widely held beliefs about presidential campaign discourse: that it has become more negative, that reporting on it has become more negative, and that there is little new from day to day in the stump speeches of the major party presidential condidates.
Full Text 
Sign-in/Register to access full text options
Sign-in/Register to access full text options 
Published version (
Free)
Free) 
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Schedule a call
