Mapping & Analyzing Mechanical Properties of Dental Restorations with Product Composition

Abstract

This study compares the compressive strength, flexural strength and micro-hardness of three types of dental composite materials {Nano-filled, Nano-hybrid, Micro-hybrid} by respective filler fraction-composition. SEM, EDS technique is used for analysis of obtained results. These days, dental restorations play a very vital role considering the dental health. Esthetically, reliably composite resins are much more superior to ancient tooth filling materials. Hence it is necessity of today’s research is to study and map the mechanical properties of different brands of composite resins and hence provide fruitful results to doctors utilizing these dental composites for satisfactory results. By this, research will be beneficiary to the society. The findings of this study indicates that for Compressive strength, Brilliant NG < Tetric N Ceram < Polofil NHT <Z 350 < Charisma. Flexural Strength, Brilliant NG < Tetric N Ceram < Charisma < Z 350 < Polofil NHT. Micro- hardness, Charisma < Tetric N Ceram < < Z 350 < Brilliant NG < Polofil NHT. In other words, Micro-hybrid- Have highest compressive strength than Nano-filled and Nano-hybrid. Nano- Hybrid- Highest flexural strength & micro-hardness than Nano-filled and Micro-hybrid.