Abstract
AbstractThis article explores the methodological possibilities for using unverifiable, contradictory, or demonstrably false accounts of the past for historical research. Drawing from the methodological example of historical studies on accusations of vampirism in colonial East Africa, it presents histories of three Ibadi Muslim manuscript libraries on the island of Jerba, Tunisia. These stories contain contradictory or otherwise unverifiable elements, each of which raises methodological questions for its use as a historical source. The article argues that by drawing upon the methodological premise of these studies of vampires, historians can approach far more basic questions of historical research regarding chronology, contradictory evidence, and veracity.
Sign-in/Register to access full text options 
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Schedule a callDisclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.
