Manuscript Rejection in Public Health, Nutrition and Dietetics Research

Abstract

It is evident that each century and decade has unique challenges and inquiries that require answers to ensure the survival of humanity on Earth. The advent of modern technologies has significantly transformed the scope and purpose of research inquiries in the fields of Public Health, Nutrition, and Dietetics. These advancements have empowered us to pose more profound questions, leading to more comprehensive outcomes and larger insights. These research questions in the fields of Public Health, Nutrition, and Dietetics accurately depict the current state of affairs. By asking the appropriate questions, we can expect to obtain the correct answers that will have a significant impact on people's lives. The writers aim to publish these answers to get the stakeholders' attention. Why, in certain cases, may this great act and display of generosity be declined? This review examines the manuscript rejection process in Public Health, Nutrition, and Dietetics Research. The fundamental elements determining whether a Public Health, Nutrition, and Dietetics Research paper is accepted or rejected are its quality, conciseness, clarity, verifiability, uniqueness, and appeal. Authors should collaborate with editors to effectively accomplish this goal, while editors and publishers should carry out their responsibilities with impartiality, avoiding any kind of prejudice in this honorable task. Effective acceptance and publication of well-executed manuscripts would greatly propel the progress of human existence on Earth by satisfying our curiosity as we explore the vast expanse of the planet, while rejection would regress us to the prehistoric era before the advent of civilization. The decision lies in our hands to opt for either sustainable development or face extinction.