Manufacture of gas

Abstract

The techniques used were the same as those used in Part 1 (p 34). Comparison of the liquefaction behaviour of two lithotypes from a Kentucky bituminous coal indicated that in this process pseudovitrinite is a reactive maceral. The hydrogenation of sets of maceral concentrates obtained from a New Mexico sub-bituminous and a Kentucky bituminous coal showed fair correlations between conversion and the total concentration of the presumed reactive macerals (vitrinite, pseudovitrinite and sporinite). Similar concentrates from a Montana lignite showed no such correlation; the one sample that showed a high conversion was a high-density fraction that had a high mineral-matter content and in which nearly all the pyrite in the coal had accumulated. Two samples that have boghead and cannel characteristics gave quite different results on hydrogenation. Both were highly aliphatic in structure and had unusually high hydrogen contents and volatile matter. One, which contained appreciable proportions of sporinite, alginite and resinite, gave essentially no conversion to oil. The other, predominantly vitrinitic but containing alginite as the second most abundant maceral, gave an excellent yield of an oil of low viscosity and aromaticity. It was concluded that although rank, petrographic composition and perhaps geological history are important factors determining liquefaction behaviour, there are other characteristics of coals that may at times override these basic parameters, and the composition of the inorganic matter may be the most significant of these other characteristics.