Abstract

In summary, the ASTRO Committee on Human Resources believes that there is ample evidence for the existence of an oversupply of radiation oncologists in the United States at the present time. It believes that this oversupply has already affected the specialty in a variety of ways that are difficult to measure, for example, increased competition, conflicts between radiation oncology groups, conflicts between the private sector and academics, and increased costs, and that it is beginning to have a significant effect on the job market. This oversupply came about because of the rapid expansion in medical school enrollment in the 1970s. This led to an increased number of graduates available for enrollment into specialty residencies, one of which was radiation oncology. The actual number of radiation oncology residency positions offered has not changed significantly since 1972. However, only about half of the residency positions were filled in the early years. Since 1986, virtually all radiation oncology training positions in the United States have been filled, and this has led to a significantly greater number of radiation oncologists entering the field than have left the field through death or retirement. Preliminary data suggest that a shift to a managed care system would result in decreased demand for radiation oncology services, and that would increase the manpower problem for our specialty.

Full Text
Paper version not known

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.