Mannish Women, Passive Men, and Constitutional Types: Margaret Mead'sSex and Temperament in Three Primitive Societiesas a Response to Ruth Benedict'sPatterns of Culture

Abstract

Previous articleNext article No AccessMannish Women, Passive Men, and Constitutional Types: Margaret Mead's Sex and Temperament in Three Primitive Societies as a Response to Ruth Benedict's Patterns of CultureLois W. BannerLois W. BannerDepartment of HistoryUniversity of Southern California Search for more articles by this author Department of HistoryUniversity of Southern CaliforniaPDFPDF PLUSFull Text Add to favoritesDownload CitationTrack CitationsPermissionsReprints Share onFacebookTwitterLinkedInRedditEmail SectionsMoreDetailsFiguresReferencesCited by Signs Volume 28, Number 3Spring 2003Gender and Science: New Issues Article DOIhttps://doi.org/10.1086/345325 Views: 320Total views on this site Citations: 18Citations are reported from Crossref © 2003 by The University of Chicago. All rights reserved.PDF download Crossref reports the following articles citing this article:Deborah L. Best, Judith L. Gibbons Women Across the History of Cross-Cultural Psychology: Research and Leadership, Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology 53, no.7-87-8 (Aug 2022): 976–992.https://doi.org/10.1177/00220221221112366Elesha Coffman “I Didn't Say That”: Margaret Mead on Nature, Nurture, and Gender in the Nuclear Age, Modern Intellectual History 18, no.11 (Aug 2019): 202–222.https://doi.org/10.1017/S1479244319000234Marcia C. Inhorn, Emily A. Wentzell Introduction, (Jan 2012): 1–20.https://doi.org/10.1215/9780822395478-001Emily Martin Grafting Together Medical Anthropology, Feminism, and Technoscience, (Jan 2012): 23–40.https://doi.org/10.1215/9780822395478-003Lynn M. Morgan Getting at Anthropology through Medical History, (Jan 2012): 41–64.https://doi.org/10.1215/9780822395478-004Lawrence Cohen Making Peasants Protestant and Other Projects, (Jan 2012): 65–92.https://doi.org/10.1215/9780822395478-005Didier Fassin That Obscure Object of Global Health, (Jan 2012): 95–115.https://doi.org/10.1215/9780822395478-007Arthur Kleinman Medical Anthropology and Mental Health, (Jan 2012): 116–128.https://doi.org/10.1215/9780822395478-008Margaret Lock From Genetics to Postgenomics and the Discovery of the New Social Body, (Jan 2012): 129–160.https://doi.org/10.1215/9780822395478-009Rayna Rapp, Faye Ginsburg Anthropology and the Study of Disability Worlds, (Jan 2012): 163–182.https://doi.org/10.1215/9780822395478-011Merrill Singers Medical Anthropology and Public Policy, (Jan 2012): 183–205.https://doi.org/10.1215/9780822395478-012Richard Parker Critical Intersections and Engagements, (Jan 2012): 206–238.https://doi.org/10.1215/9780822395478-013 Notes, (Jan 2012): 239–250.https://doi.org/10.1215/9780822395478-014 References, (Jan 2012): 251–306.https://doi.org/10.1215/9780822395478-015Lise M. Dobrin, Ira Bashkow “Arapesh Warfare”: Reo Fortune's Veiled Critique of Margaret Mead's Sex and Temperament, American Anthropologist 112, no.33 (Aug 2010): 370–383.https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1548-1433.2010.01246.xMadeline H. Caviness Feminism, Gender studies, and Medieval Studies, Diogenes 57, no.11 (Oct 2010): 30–45.https://doi.org/10.1177/0392192110369441Madeline H. Caviness Féminisme, Gender Studies et études médiévales, Diogène n° 225, no.11 (Jan 2010): 33–54.https://doi.org/10.3917/dio.225.0033Kimberly Engber Anthropological Fictions: On Character, Culture, and Sexuality in the Work of Margaret Mead, Ruth Benedict, and Virginia Woolf, Prospects 30 (Jul 2009): 363–382.https://doi.org/10.1017/S0361233300002088