Abstract

Enriching the life of farm animals is a legal obligation in intensive farming conditions in the European Union, though not worldwide. In pigs, manipulable materials are mandatory when no bedding is available. Like manipulable objects, positive human interactions might also be considered as enrichment, as they provide the animals with opportunities to interact, increase their activity and lead to positive emotional states. In this study, we investigated how weaned pigs perceived an inanimate manipulable object and a familiar human. After a similar (in length, frequency, and procedure) familiarization to both stimuli, 24 weaned pigs were tested for a potential preference for one of the stimuli and submitted to isolation/reunion tests to evaluate the emotional value of the stimuli. We hypothesized that being reunited with a stimulus would attenuate the stress of social isolation and promote a positive state, especially if the stimulus had a positive emotional value for pigs. Although our behavioral data showed no evidence that pigs spent more time close to, or in contact with, one of the stimuli during a choice test, pigs more often approached the human and were observed lying down only near the human. Using behavioral and bioacoustic data from isolation/reunion tests, we showed that a reunion with the human decreased the time spent in an attentive state and mobility of pigs to a greater extent than a reunion with the object, or isolation. Vocalizations differed between reunions with the object and the human, and were different from those during isolation. The human and object presence led to higher frequency range and more noisy grunts, but only the human led to the production of positive shorter grunts, usually associated with positive situations. In conclusion, pigs seemed to be in a more positive emotional state, or be reassured, in the presence of a familiar human compared to the object after a short period of social isolation. This confirms the potential need for positive pseudo-social interactions with a human to enrich the pigs' environment, at least in or after potentially stressful situations.

Highlights

  • An intensive production system for animal products sometimes implies high densities of farm animals and can lead to deleterious behaviors and decrease their physical or mental health, i.e., their welfare.Animal welfare covers, among other things, the importance of the animal’s ability to control its mental and physiological stability in different environmental conditions [1]

  • The statistical analyses on Principal components (PCs) are presented in the result section, but Supplementary Table 2 describes each behavioral parameter depending on the experimental conditions

  • On the first behavioral response score, the mean duration in the stimulus zone, the proportion of time spent in the stimulus zone, the time spent in contact with the stimulus and the total time spent in the zone loaded negatively

Read more

Summary

Introduction

An intensive production system for animal products sometimes implies high densities of farm animals and can lead to deleterious behaviors and decrease their physical or mental health, i.e., their welfare. Among other things, the importance of the animal’s ability to control its mental and physiological stability in different environmental conditions [1]. Environmental enrichments are defined as materials which can improve the biological functioning of captive animals [5] and should stimulate their species-typical sensory systems, cognitive capacities and behaviors [6]. Enrichment materials should be provided in such a way that they offer sustainable attraction for pigs, should be accessible for oral manipulation, and provided in sufficient amount [5, 8]. Enrichment effects are generally tested using behavioral and physiological paradigms [9] and are classified as optimal (if they meet all of the above-mentioned criteria), suboptimal (if meet most of the criteria but should be combined with other enrichment materials) or marginal [if they do not fulfill the animals’ needs and should only be used with other enrichment materials [8]]

Objectives
Methods
Results
Conclusion

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.