Abstract

Mangroves, seagrass meadows, and salt marshes, collectively termed Forests, are counted among the most valuable and productive coastal ecosystems on the planet. A recent literature review of the Blue Forest valuation research identified mangroves as the most frequently analyzed of these ecosystems, yet the literature demonstrates several deficits in terms of geographic location of studies, methods used to value the services, and most notably, a lack of valuation for cultural services. To better understand this, we analyzed the studies dealing specifically with mangroves from the original literature review to quantify what has been valued, where, by which methods, and the variation in the published values. We then use this information to synthesize our current level of knowledge on the type and value of services provided by mangroves, discuss data gaps, and address specifically the collection of data relevant to cultural ecosystem services (CES). Our results shed light on two principle issues affecting the mangrove valuation literature: overuse of benefit transfer in valuing mangrove ecosystem services and a lack of attention paid to the CES that mangroves provide. The mangrove valuation literature is not yet robust, lacking estimates of many ecosystem services, including CES, such as spiritual and aesthetic value. Most published studies focus on a small selection of ecosystem services based on the availability of benefit transfer values and the ability to easily measure values with market prices. Thus, many ecosystem services that cannot be valued monetarily, but that are often equally important to local communities, are ignored. Given the wide range of ecosystem services mangroves provide and the variety of valuation methods that need to be collectively employed, we argue that doing valuation studies well requires a multi-disciplinary approach, bringing together anthropologists, social scientists, ecologists and economists. Thoughtfully and thoroughly including the local stakeholders in valuation studies and the resultant policy discussions leads to a more holistic understanding of the services mangroves provide, and viable solutions with an increase in local willingness to act in accordance with those solutions.

Highlights

  • Coastal vegetated ecosystems, such as mangroves, seagrass meadows, and salt marshes, are considered to be some of the most valuable and productive coastal ecosystems on the planet (Barbier et al, 2011; Mcleod et al, 2011; Wylie et al, 2016)

  • The primary goal of this paper is to explore the following questions: (1) Is the current literature robust enough to give us an accurate understanding of mangrove value? (2) Where do we stand on evaluating mangrove cultural ecosystem services (CES)? Through a systematic literature review, we shed light on these issues and present considerations that should be kept in mind when valuing the ecosystem services provided by mangrove ecosystems

  • Of those mangrove valuation studies published between 2007 and 2016, 32 of the 70 (45.7%) studies used benefit transfer to estimate the value of ecosystem services

Read more

Summary

Introduction

Coastal vegetated ecosystems, such as mangroves, seagrass meadows, and salt marshes, are considered to be some of the most valuable and productive coastal ecosystems on the planet (Barbier et al, 2011; Mcleod et al, 2011; Wylie et al, 2016). One of the most talked about blue forest ecosystem services has been carbon sequestration/storage due to the growing recognition of the effectiveness of these habitats in climate regulation through pulling carbon out of the atmosphere (Murray et al, 2011; Pendleton et al, 2012). The valuation of ecosystem services is a way of evaluating what society is willing to trade off to conserve a particular ecosystem service by either quantitatively or qualitatively assessing its value (TEEB, 2010) The aim of such an exercise is to inform policy or management decisions by providing a better understanding of what services and benefits an ecosystem provides to people and how the services might change under different management scenarios (Pendleton et al, 2015). It can improve knowledge for informed decision-making, raise awareness on blue forest ecosystems, and to foster cooperation among blue forest stakeholders

Objectives
Methods
Results
Discussion
Conclusion
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call