Abstract

Carbon sequestration below ground depends on organic matter input and decomposition, but regulatory bottlenecks remain unclear. The relative importance of plant production, climate and edaphic factors has to be elucidated to better predict carbon storage in forests. In Swedish forest soil inventory data from across the entire boreal latitudinal range (n = 2378), the concentration of exchangeable manganese was singled out as the strongest predictor (R2 = 0.26) of carbon storage in the extensive organic horizon (mor layer), which accounts for one third of the total below ground carbon. In comparison, established ecosystem models applied on the same data have failed to predict carbon stocks (R2 < 0.05), and in our study manganese availability overshadowed both litter production and climatic factors. We also identified exchangeable potassium as an additional strong predictor, however strongly correlated with manganese. The negative correlation between manganese and carbon highlights the importance of Mn-peroxidases in oxidative decomposition of recalcitrant organic matter. The results support the idea that the fungus-driven decomposition could be a critical factor regulating humus carbon accumulation in boreal forests, as Mn-peroxidases are specifically produced by basidiomycetes.

Highlights

  • Boreal forests have been estimated to store 24% of terrestrial C1 and 64% of this C is found below ground[2]

  • Climate and productivity alone cannot explain the carbon storage, but the decisive factors are likely to vary between ecosystems

  • The dynamics of the humus layer is critical in regulating ecosystem productivity, since retention of N in humus constrains its availability to plants and limits their production[5]

Read more

Summary

Introduction

Boreal forests have been estimated to store 24% of terrestrial C1 and 64% of this C is found below ground[2]. We take advantage of data from an extensive inventory of forest soils to examine the importance of Mn for long term below ground C storage at biome level compared to several other potential regulators.

Results
Conclusion
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call