Abstract
ObjectiveTo evaluate the long-term outcomes of Class II treatment with the Jasper Jumper appliance and comprehensive orthodontic treatment concerning inclination of the mandibular incisors and gingival recession.MethodsSixteen patients with Class II malocclusion at a mean age of 12.54y (SD = 1.17) were treated with the Jasper Jumper appliance and comprehensive orthodontic treatment. The mean treatment time was 2.05y (SD = 0.21). Dental records were taken before (T1), after treatment (T2) and 11.90y (SD = 0.48) after debonding (T3). The frequency of gingival recession, clinical crown height and mandibular incisor position were evaluated using intraoral photographs, digital models and lateral cephalograms. Interphase changes were evaluated using dependent t and McNemar’s tests. Correlation between clinical crown height and final position of the mandibular incisors was evaluated using Pearson correlation test (P < 0.05).ResultsThe frequency of gingival recessions increased over time and was observed in 6 (9.4%), 12 (18.8%) and 24 (37.5%) of the mandibular incisors at T1, T2 and T3, respectively. A significant increase in labial inclination and protrusion of the mandibular incisors was observed between T1 and T2 interval. The clinical crown height significantly increased in the follow-up period (T3–T2) and in the complete observation time (T3–T1). There was no correlation between the amount of labial inclination and protrusion of the mandibular incisors and clinical crown height for all time intervals.ConclusionNo significant correlation between the amount of labial movement of the mandibular incisor and clinical crown height increase was found.
Highlights
Fixed functional appliances are frequently used for treatment of Class II malocclusion [1,2,3]
A meta-analysis showed that fixed functional appliances engaged on multibracket systems have mostly dentoalveolar effects rather than skeletal effects for Class II malocclusion correction [4]
Labial movement of mandibular incisors promoted by fixed functional appliances would be a predisposing factor for gingival recessions in the long term [10]
Summary
Fixed functional appliances are frequently used for treatment of Class II malocclusion [1,2,3]. A meta-analysis showed that fixed functional appliances engaged on multibracket systems have mostly dentoalveolar effects rather than skeletal effects for Class II malocclusion correction [4]. Many factors are associated with gingival recessions and previous studies related to gingival. A possible explanation for gingival recession after orthodontic treatment is bone dehiscence development related to tooth movement against the labial/buccal bone plate. In this context, labial movement of mandibular incisors promoted by fixed functional appliances would be a predisposing factor for gingival recessions in the long term [10]. According to Garib et al [12], incisor buccolingual movements are considered the most critical orthodontic movement predisposing to bone dehiscence
Sign-in/Register to view highlights & summary Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Schedule a callDisclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.
