Abstract

The purpose of the study was to evaluate the influence of the skeletal maturation in the mandibular and dentoalveolar growth and development during the Class II, division 1, malocclusion correction with Balters bionator. Three groups of children with Class II, division 1, malocclusion were evaluated. Two of them were treated for one year with the bionator of Balters appliance in different skeletal ages (Group 1: 6 children, 7 to 8 years old and Group 2: 10 children, 9 to 10 years old) and the other one was followed without treatment ( 7 children, 8 to 9 years old). Lateral 45 degree cephalometric radiographs were used for the evaluation of the mandibular growth and dentoalveolar development. Tantalum metallic implants were used as fixed and stable references for radiograph superimposition and data acquisition. Student's t test was used in the statistical analysis of the displacement of the points in the condyle, ramus, mandibular base and dental points. One-fixed criteria analysis of variance was used to evaluate group differences (95% of level of significance). The intragroup evaluation showed that all groups present significant skeletal growth for all points analyzed (1.2 to 3.7 mm), but in an intergroup comparison, the increments of the mandibular growth in the condyle, ramus and mandibular base were not statically different. For the dentoalveolar modifications, the less mature children showed greater labial inclination of the lower incisors (1.86 mm) and the most mature children showed greater first permanent molar extrusion (4.8 mm).

Highlights

  • MethodsThis study used radiographs of a sample composed by 23 Caucasian patients being 09 males and 14 females, with bone ages between 7‐10 years, Angle’s Class II malocclusion, division 1, and mandibular deficiency

  • The objective of this study is to evaluate the influence of bone maturation, in mandibular and dentoalveolar growth and development, natural and induced by treatment of Class II malocclusion, division 1, with Balters bionator

  • Identifying whether the orthopedic device only changes the direction of condylar growth or the rate and amount of this growth has been the purpose of many authors

Read more

Summary

Methods

This study used radiographs of a sample composed by 23 Caucasian patients being 09 males and 14 females, with bone ages between 7‐10 years, Angle’s Class II malocclusion, division 1, and mandibular deficiency. 45° (oblique teleradiography), of right and left hemimandibles, and hand and wrist radiographs were taken by the same technician on the same day, using X-ray machine (Funk Orbital X15), Lanex screens and TMG film with the factors: 82 kVp, 80 mA and 0.5 seconds exposure. These radiographs were collected prospectively in two stages with an interval of 1 year and archived in the Post-Graduation Course in Orthodontics, School of Dentistry - UNESP, in the city of Araraquara (SP).

Results
Discussion
Conclusion
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call