Abstract
ABSTRACT This study examines the difference in management forecast quality under mandatory vs. voluntary disclosure in China’s stock markets in terms of management forecasting error (MFE) and value relevance. The results of MFE tests reveal that the disclosure approach is significantly associated with forecast accuracy, and voluntarily disclosed forecasts are more accurate than mandatorily disclosed forecasts. In terms of value relevance, the results are also consistent with the belief that in China’s stock markets, management forecast quality under voluntary disclosure is higher than that under mandatory disclosure.
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Similar Papers
More From: Asia-Pacific Journal of Accounting & Economics
Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.