Mandated Diabetes Registries Will Not Benefit Persons With Diabetes

Abstract

intermediate. Ann Intern Med. 2006;144(7): 465-474. 3. Bodenheimer T, Wagner EH, Grumbach K. Improving primary care for patients with chronic illness: the chronic care model, part 2. JAMA. 2002; 288(15):1909-1914. 4. Robert Wood Johnson Foundation. Improving chronic illness care. http://improvingchroniccare .org/. Accessed December 1, 2006. 5. US Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. National Program of Cancer Registries. http://www .cdc.gov/cancer/npcr/npcrpdfs/0607_npcr_fs .pdf. Accessed January 15, 2007. 6. Frieden TR. Asleep at the switch: local public health and chronic disease. Am J Public Health. 2004; 94(12):2059-2061. 7. New York City Department of Health and Mental Hygiene. The New York City A1C Registry. http: / /www.nyc.gov/html/doh/html/d iabetes /diabetes-nycar.shtml#pt. Accessed February 3, 2007. 8. Steinbrook R. Facing the diabetes epidemic— mandatory reporting of glycosylated hemoglobin values in New York City. N Engl J Med. 2006; 354(6):545-548. 9. Tu JV, Willison DJ, Silver FL, et al. Impracticability of informed consent in the Registry of the Canadian Stroke Network. N Engl J Med. 2004; 350(14):1414-1421. 10. Haynes MA, Smedley BD, eds. The Unequal Burden of Cancer: An Assessment of NIH Research and Programs for Ethnic Minorities and the Medically Underserved. Washington, DC: National Academy Press; 1999. 11. MacLean CD, Littenberg B, Gagnon M. Diabetes decision support: initial experience with the Vermont diabetes information system. Am J Public Health. 2006;96(4):593-595. 12. Littenberg B, Maclean CD. Passive consent for clinical research in the age of HIPAA. J Gen Intern Med. 2006;21(3):207-211.