Abstract

Environmental and anthropogenic changes in lakes have implications for fishers’ livelihoods in form of their forced migration and occupational change. Those advocating lake restorations often face a dilemma whenasked if lake restoration will also restore the lost livelihoods. Answering such questions are difficult because most people are not programmed for frequent changes in their livelihood structures. Using the case study of Manchar Lake fishers who seemingly have faced such transition, this study brings insights on this broad question. We developed an in-person survey based on Contingent Valuation Method (CVM) to study 300 fishers’ responses to a hypothetical situation whereby they were asked to “Switch Back” to Manchar Lake assuming that it has been restored to provide various ecosystem services. Results show that complete transformation in the livelihoods of fishing communities has taken place with remarkable variation in their access to assets and livelihood outcomes. Despite increase in their access to physical capital such as school, hospital, roads, and markets, the communities are still vulnerable to income shocks and rarely enjoy privileges such as house ownership. The comparative state of current and past livelihoods and asset possessions determine ones’ willingness to switch back to fishing in Manchar Lake. Those who may have performed better in the said transition are less likely to return to their erstwhile occupations even if the lake is restored and vice-versa. We conclude that satisfaction with current livelihood outcomes is low and willingness to switch back to fishing in Manchar Lake is high since many had been poor performers in the transition. While the environmental rationale for the Manchar Lake’s ecological restoration already exists, this study suggests that there also exists a socioeconomic rationale albeit in a way that restoration also supports contemporary ecological services such as tourism.

Highlights

  • Ecosystem services provide basis to link human and natural systems

  • Literature on ecosystem services suggests that biological services are identified and recognized by society only when they are degraded [2]

  • Concerns over resource degradation and loss of ecosystem had been the fundamental motivation behind investment in establishing institutional arrangements for sustainable management of critical natural resource systems [3]

Read more

Summary

Introduction

Ecosystem services provide basis to link human and natural systems. The main idea underlying this concept is that changes in natural systems affect human well-being and vice versa [1]. Literature on ecosystem services suggests that biological services are identified and recognized by society only when they are degraded [2]. Concerns over resource degradation and loss of ecosystem had been the fundamental motivation behind investment in establishing institutional arrangements for sustainable management of critical natural resource systems [3]. The Millennium Ecosystem Assessment Report (2005) reported a loss of more than 50% wetland area during the 20th century. It is noted that extrapolating this rate of loss to other regions or wetland types was “speculative only.”. It is noted that extrapolating this rate of loss to other regions or wetland types was “speculative only.” For example, the global wetlands ranges between 30% and 90%, depending on the

Methods
Results
Conclusion
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call