Abstract

This paper investigates two risk-management techniques originally created for stock market momentum strategies, i.e. a) constant volatility targeting (scaling) and b) the implementation of stop-losses in the cross-section of portfolio components. It applies them to momentum strategies in currency markets and compares their effectiveness. It finds that constant volatility targeting (scaling) has no beneficial effect. In fact, detailed analysis suggests that it is a method uniquely suited to stock market momentum. Stop-losses are also far less useful than in stock markets. Finally, it suggests that not macroeconomic risk factors, but limits to arbitrage (stemming from high idiosyncratic volatility) are a potential source of currency momentum’s high returns.

Full Text
Paper version not known

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.