Abstract
Three alternatives for managing the demand side welfare impact of an unanticipated supply shortage in a crucial commodity are compared under uncertain demand and costly information. A tax handles uncertainty best, but is costly to compute and produces the same high price as laissez faire. A rationing scheme set to match expected consumption levels produced by the tax is also expensive to compute, but it is best among quotas. Arbitrary coupon quotas cum white markets are more easily set, and they achieve ultimate consumption distributions identical, in expected value, to the best quota. There is a distributional cost associated with the coupon market, though, and its size depends upon the size of the error made in setting the initial coupon allocation.
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.