Managing the bacterial contamination risk in an axenic mice animal facility.

Abstract

A gap exists between good laboratory practices with axenic animals and the procedures applied. This work examined the efficacy of sodium dichloroisocyanurate (MB-10) and potassium peroxymonosulfate (Virkon™) disinfectants, as well as the appropriate soaking time for materials used with the ISOcage Biosafety Station™. We also compared the microbial load in cage systems hosting mice over 2 weeks in axenic rooms (ARs) and in typical specific-pathogen-free (SPF) non-axenic rooms (NARs) to identify resistant microorganisms, targeted for longer soaking disinfection, and evaluated the necessary procedures for reducing the microbial load in AR. Staphylococcus was the most frequently isolated genus (in both ARs and NARs). An average of three spore-forming microorganisms per cage were counted from AR. The disinfection time to reach 1 log reduction for Bacillus atrophaeus spores varied from 138 s (100 ppm MB-10) to 290 (Virkon™) to <20 s for S. epidermidis (100 ppm MB-10). AR management protocols lead to a microbial load that is 1000 times lower than that found in NARs. Data comparing the microbial load in SPF and axenic facilities can be used to improve the effectiveness of their microbial control procedures.