Abstract

The presence of a high diversity of different successional stages in a landscape may help to conserve and promote landscape-wide biodiversity. A strategy to achieve this is using Cyclic Rejuvenation through Management (CRM), an approach employed in a variety of different ecosystems. CRM periodically resets the successional stages in a landscape. For aquatic systems this constitutes vegetation removal and dredging. For this approach to be useful (a) successional stages are required to be different in community composition and (b) these differences need to be caused by true replacement of species between stages. While potentially valid, these assumptions are not generally tested prior to application of CMR. In this study we test these assumptions to explore the usefulness of managing on successional stage heterogeneity for maximizing landscape-wide aquatic plant diversity. We carried out vegetation surveys in the ditch networks of 21 polder landscapes in Netherlands, each containing 24 ditch reaches. Using a clustering approach combined with insight from literature on vegetation succession in these systems we assigned our sampled communities to defined successional stages. After partitioning landscape diversity into its alpha and beta components, we quantified the relative importance of replacement among successional stages. Next, through scenario analyses based on simulations we studied the effects of reducing successional stage heterogeneity on landscape-wide biodiversity. Results showed that differences in community composition among successional stages were a potentially important factor contributing to landscape diversity. Early successional stages were characterized by higher replacement of species compared to late successional stages. In a scenario of gradual decrease of heterogeneity through the systematic loss of the earliest successional stages we found 20% of the species richness in a polder was lost, pointing toward the importance of maintaining early successional stages in a polder. This makes a compelling case for application of CRM within agricultural drainage ditch landscapes to maximize regional aquatic plant diversity. While applied to drainage ditch systems, our data-driven approach is broadly applicable to other systems and may help in providing first indications of the potential of the CRM approach. We argue that CRM may maintain and promote regional biodiversity without compromising the hydrological function of the systems.

Highlights

  • Land use intensification and global change have led to decreasing biotic diversity (Foley et al, 2005)

  • We tested the potential effect of landscape-wide heterogeneity in successional stages on the landscape-wide diversity. This was done by calculating the biodiversity of simulated landscapes with different combinations of successional stages. Based on these results we evaluate the hypothesized merit of Cyclic Rejuvenation through Management (CRM) on promoting landscape-wide diversity in ditch systems (Clarke, 2015) through proliferation of a diverse spatial-temporal mosaic of habitats

  • This has led to the typical Dutch polder landscapes in which long, narrow fields are intersected by a network of drainage ditches, with the whole system being surrounded by dykes

Read more

Summary

Introduction

Land use intensification and global change have led to decreasing biotic diversity (Foley et al, 2005). Global species numbers show clear negative trends, though different levels of spatial scale show very different trends (McGill et al, 2015) Much of this biodiversity loss is caused by increasing homogenization of communities (i.e., biotic homogenization), and not necessarily by loss of local diversity (Dornelas et al, 2014). Examples of such disturbances include fire (Vandvik et al, 2005), scouring by peak river discharges (Tockner et al, 2000) or landslides (Walker et al, 1996) In absence of such natural dynamics, for example due to human interventions, there is a risk of loss of successional stage heterogeneity within the landscape (Baptist et al, 2004)

Methods
Results
Conclusion

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.