Abstract
In recent years the high cost of litigation of employment disputes has resulted in the many employers adopting alternative dispute resolution mechanisms. Employment arbitration has been the choice of many firms to minimize the risk associated with wrongful dismissal and other employment related issues. Arbitration is faster and simpler than courtroom litigation. However, perhaps the main reason for this move to employment arbitration is that arbitrators are limited to a make whole remedy virtually eliminating the pain and suffering and exemplary damages which may be awarded in court. There are specific issues which must be addressed if employment arbitration is to be enforced in the courts and is going to serve the purposes of minimizing litigation risks, these are reviewed in this paper. There are also questions which should be examined in deciding if employment arbitration will serve a useful purpose in any organization.
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.