Abstract
Measures implemented to restore ecosystem services are widely believed to conflict with food production in the world's irrigated regions because of their competition for scarce water. However, little integrated analysis has been conducted to test this hypothesis. This work tests that hypothesis by presenting results of a basin-scale hydroeconomic analysis linking biophysical, hydrologic, agronomic, ecological, economic, policy, and institutional dimensions of the partially-restored Mesopotamian Marshes of Western Asia. Results serve to partly reject the hypothesis: Here we find that an economically-optimized ecosystem restoration trajectory can be achieved with a minimal loss in food production or farm income where restored wetlands complement important dimensions of food production. Moreover, we find that where water shortage sharing rules can be made more flexible, ecosystem restoration more nearly complements improved food security. Our results point to previously unexplored synergies among food production, ecosystem restoration, and water laws in arid and semi-arid regions internationally.
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have