Abstract
ABSTRACT This paper used communication theory of resilience (CTR) and high-reliability organization (HRO) theory to investigate the influence of resilience processes on disruption management outcomes (DMOs) at both the individual and team levels and at two points in time. Perceptions of individual and team stress, efficacy, and performance were examined longitudinally in surveys with working adults (N = 192, 151). Results indicated (a) communicative resilience was significantly related to improvements in DMOs at time 1 (T1), (b) highly-reliable organizing was significantly related to improvements in DMOs for individuals and teams at both collection times, and that (c) high-reliability organizing practices were generally more predictive of positive DMOs than communicative resilience; however, the two forms of resilience are compatible and complementary.
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Schedule a callDisclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.
