Abstract
ABSTRACT This paper used communication theory of resilience (CTR) and high-reliability organization (HRO) theory to investigate the influence of resilience processes on disruption management outcomes (DMOs) at both the individual and team levels and at two points in time. Perceptions of individual and team stress, efficacy, and performance were examined longitudinally in surveys with working adults (N = 192, 151). Results indicated (a) communicative resilience was significantly related to improvements in DMOs at time 1 (T1), (b) highly-reliable organizing was significantly related to improvements in DMOs for individuals and teams at both collection times, and that (c) high-reliability organizing practices were generally more predictive of positive DMOs than communicative resilience; however, the two forms of resilience are compatible and complementary.
Sign-in/Register to access full text options 
Free) 
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Schedule a call
