Abstract

Management strategies for control of vector-borne diseases, for example Zika or dengue, include using larvicide and/or adulticide, either through large-scale application by truck or plane or through door-to-door efforts that require obtaining permission to access private property and spray yards. The efficacy of the latter strategy is highly dependent on the compliance of local residents. Here we develop a model for vector-borne disease transmission between mosquitoes and humans in a neighborhood setting, considering a network of houses connected via nearest-neighbor mosquito movement. We incorporate large-scale application of adulticide via aerial spraying through a uniform increase in vector death rates in all sites, and door-to-door application of larval source reduction and adulticide through a decrease in vector emergence rates and an increase in vector death rates in compliant sites only, where control efficacies are directly connected to real-world experimentally measurable control parameters, application frequencies, and control costs. To develop mechanistic insight into the influence of vector motion and compliance clustering on disease controllability, we determine the basic reproduction number R0 for the system, provide analytic results for the extreme cases of no mosquito movement, infinite hopping rates, and utilize degenerate perturbation theory for the case of slow but non-zero hopping rates. We then determine the application frequencies required for each strategy (alone and combined) in order to reduce R0 to unity, along with the associated costs. Cost-optimal strategies are found to depend strongly on mosquito hopping rates, levels of door-to-door compliance, and spatial clustering of compliant houses, and can include aerial spray alone, door-to-door treatment alone, or a combination of both. The optimization scheme developed here provides a flexible tool for disease management planners which translates modeling results into actionable control advice adaptable to system-specific details.

Highlights

  • The increased worldwide emergence and re-emergence of vector-borne diseases seen in recent decades demands increasingly efficacious responses from health and government agencies for the prevention of public health crises [1,2,3]

  • The optimal control protocols we find for reducing the basic reproduction number will be naturally phrased in terms of actionable control advice based on real-world control parameters

  • When compliance is very low with moderate to slow hopping rates, when the hopping rate is very low, or when the non-compliant sites are highly clustered with moderate to slow hopping rates, we find that the system can not be controlled with door-to-door efforts alone, and adulticide aerial spray must be used in order to reduce R0 to unity

Read more

Summary

Introduction

The increased worldwide emergence and re-emergence of vector-borne diseases seen in recent decades demands increasingly efficacious responses from health and government agencies for the prevention of public health crises [1,2,3]. The first evidence of local Zika transmission on the United States mainland was reported by the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) on July 29, 2016, when four cases of human infection were confirmed in Miami-Dade County, Florida [7]. When an active transmission zone is identified, the CDC recommends focusing and intensifying vector control efforts within the immediate vicinity of the area in order to keep diseases localized [10]. The Miami-Dade County outbreak suggests that Zika spread in human population centers is highly localized, with 256 cases reported over a small number of neighborhood areas no more than a few square miles in size [13, 14]

Objectives
Methods
Results
Discussion
Conclusion
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call