Abstract

The broadly-based literature on organizational studies has concentrated mainly on resolving organizational issues through acquisition of resources, decreasing transaction costs and incentives. In other words, scholars commonly examine the organization itself, at the expense of inter-organizational relations. However, with the emergence of “network governance” organizations are no longer to be considered as isolated but rather as actors that actively seek to maintain themselves in a given situation by collaborating with other actors, forming organizational networks. This study utilizes a network perspective to examine the influence of leadership on management of unity/diversity contradiction in educational program implementation. A deductive approach is used to generate propositions by analyzing implementation efforts in respect of educational program in Azerbaijan: “State Program on education of Azerbaijan youth abroad in the years 2007-2015”. The analysis examined a research question: How do leadership activities affect to manage unity/diversity contradiction in network? This question was addressed using qualitative method. In education program, unity and diversity were found to exert an important influence on success of network. At the implementation level, understanding of unity and diversity concept helps network managers to attract diverse actors to the network and unite them around network’s goal. The coordinating units of network manage the unity/diversity contradiction by activating member organizations, facilitating interaction, framing the structure and mobilizing network members. Thus, effective management of contradiction increases the network’s capacity to access information, financial resources and experiences.

Highlights

  • Educational programs play a significant role in the creation of high level human resources; in the last fifteen to twenty years, most such programs have been implemented through inter-organizational networks (Hjern & Porter, 1981; O’Toole & Montjoy, 1984; Kickert et al, 1997; Hall & O’Toole, 2000; Monni et al, 2018)

  • Network sustained diversity along certain dimensions and generated unity along others and in this way they could deal with unity/diversity contradiction

  • By investigating “State Program on education of Azerbaijan youth abroad in the years 2007-2015” network, this research finds that unification around metagoal, experience and identity and sustaining diversity around several dimensions- organizational size, geographical difference, type of clients and so on. - is key to manage unity/diversity contradiction effectively and increase network effectiveness

Read more

Summary

Introduction

Educational programs play a significant role in the creation of high level human resources; in the last fifteen to twenty years, most such programs have been implemented through inter-organizational networks (Hjern & Porter, 1981; O’Toole & Montjoy, 1984; Kickert et al, 1997; Hall & O’Toole, 2000; Monni et al, 2018) This may be due to the growth of social and economic complexity or problems nowadays known as “wicked” (Rittel & Webber, 1973; Borisov et al, 2018), challenging the capacity of government to respond. Increasing complexity requires government to introduce new forms of organizational management in order to produce complex solutions For this reason, governments look to solve major social and educational problems by implementing large-scale programs under a multi-organizational arrangement or network. Collaboration in networks is not an easy task, and more than 50% of organizational alliances fail (Kelly & Schaan, 2002; Park & Ungson, 2001)

Objectives
Methods
Results
Conclusion
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call