Abstract

Managerial overconfidence refers to managers’ cognitive bias, according to which they demonstrate unwarranted belief in their own judgments and capabilities. This study provides a new measurement of CEO overconfidence through textual analysis of management discussion and analysis (MD&A) in 10-K documents by making use of the US Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) EDGAR database. Overconfidence was obtained from “optimism” using the Diction program. From a sample of 19,367 US firms from 1994 to 2016, we found that CEO overconfidence was negatively related to corporate social responsibility (CSR) activities. Since overconfident CEOs are likely to consider CSR activities less important than their own ability, they seem to reduce CSR activities. Also, CSR activities initiated by overconfident CEOs were negatively related to firms’ long-term performance. However, CSR activities led to positive long-term performance in firms that were financially constrained. Our findings show that CSR activities undertaken as a result of CEO overconfidence by financially unconstrained firms could be harmful to shareholder value in the long term.

Highlights

  • CEOs, like all people, have limited rationality, so they do not always make optimal decisions

  • We investigated the relationship between managerial overconfidence and corporate social responsibility (CSR) activities using a textual analysis of 10-K reports from the US Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) EDGAR database

  • We introduced a dummy variable for decreased cash flow (DC)

Read more

Summary

Introduction

CEOs, like all people, have limited rationality, so they do not always make optimal decisions. Little is known about how managerial overconfidence impacts corporate social responsibility (CSR) activities. We investigated the relationship between managerial overconfidence and CSR activities using a textual analysis of 10-K reports from the US Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) EDGAR database. The relationship between CSR and financial performance could be negative, because CSR expenditures cause additional costs for firms and divert funds from more profitable potential investments. This negative relationship was confirmed by a number of empirical studies (e.g., [11,12,13])

Objectives
Methods
Results
Discussion
Conclusion
Full Text
Paper version not known

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.