Abstract
We extend the “implicit incentives” literature by analyzing how career concerns affect a riskneutral manager’s decision about how much to learn about a project before investing in it. The manager has unknown ability that determines the probability with which a good project is available, so the market updates ability assessments from project outcomes. While project choice is efficient in equilibrium, an unobservable investment in the precision of project evaluation allows the manager to control the probabilities of future reputational states. This distorts his investment in precision above first best when project payoffs can be observed only on accepted projects.
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have