Abstract

Abstract. Implementation of the Nitrates Directive (NiD) and its environmental impacts were compared for member states in the northwest of the European Union (Ireland, United Kingdom, Denmark, the Netherlands, Belgium, Northern France and Germany). The main sources of data were national reports for the third reporting period for the NiD (2004–2007) and results of the MITERRA-EUROPE model. Implementation of the NiD in the considered member states is fairly comparable regarding restrictions for where and when to apply fertilizer and manure, but very different regarding application limits for N fertilization. Issues of concern and improvement of the implementation of the NiD are accounting for the fertilizer value of nitrogen in manure, and relating application limits for total nitrogen (N) to potential crop yield and N removal. The most significant environmental effect of the implementation of the NiD since 1995 is a major contribution to the decrease of the soil N balance (N surplus), particularly in Belgium, Denmark, Ireland, the Netherlands and the United Kingdom. This decrease is accompanied by a modest decrease of nitrate concentrations since 2000 in fresh surface waters in most countries. This decrease is less prominent for groundwater in view of delayed response of nitrate in deep aquifers. In spite of improved fertilization practices, the southeast of the Netherlands, the Flemish Region and Brittany remain to be regions of major concern in view of a combination of a high nitrogen surplus, high leaching fractions to groundwater and tenacious exceedance of the water quality standards. On average the gross N balance in 2008 for the seven member states in EUROSTAT and in national reports was about 20 kg N ha−1 yr−1 lower than by MITERRA. The major cause is higher estimates of N removal in national reports which can amount to more than 50 kg N ha−1 yr−1. Differences between procedures in member states to assess nitrogen balances and water quality and a lack of cross-boundary policy evaluations are handicaps when benchmarking the effectiveness of the NiD. This provides a challenge for the European Commission and its member states, as the NiD remains an important piece of legislation for protecting drinking water quality in regions with many private or small public production facilities and controlling aquatic eutrophication from agricultural sources.

Highlights

  • The main aim of the Nitrates Directive (1991: Directive 91/676/EEC; hereafter referred to as NiD) is to reduce water pollution caused or induced by nitrate and phosphorus from agricultural sources

  • Yield differences per hectare in northwestern EU member states are largest for milk and ruminant meat because of large differences in shares of grazing beef and dairy cattle, areas of marginal grassland, grass in arable rotations (e.g. Denmark) and grazing intensity

  • All countries considered are net importers of substantial amounts of fodder and feed stuff, in the range of 200–400 kg per livestock unit (LSU; reference unit for livestock species based on feed requirement) in the period between 2000 and 2007 (FAOSTAT), with the exception of France (120 kg LSU−1)

Read more

Summary

Introduction

The main aim of the Nitrates Directive (1991: Directive 91/676/EEC; hereafter referred to as NiD) is to reduce water pollution caused or induced by nitrate and phosphorus from agricultural sources. The NiD is the most important piece of European (EU) regulation for reducing environmental impacts of fertilizer and manure and for increasing nitrogen use efficiency. The gross nitrogen balance, or nitrogen surplus, (Schroder et al, 2004; Vries et al, 2011) is an important indicator to evaluate the environmental impacts of the Nitrates Directive, for the water compartment. This makes the NiD an important supporting instrument for other EU directives i.e. the Drinking Water Framework Directive (98/83/EC), the Water Frame Directive (2000/60/EC) and the Marine Strategy Framework Directive (2008/56/EC). In the case of the Netherlands and the Flemish region, part of the (processed) manure is exported to other countries

Objectives
Methods
Results
Discussion
Conclusion
Full Text
Paper version not known

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.