Management of the distal ureter and bladder cuff at the time of nephroureterectomy: an overview of open, laparoscopic, and robotic approaches.

Abstract

Radical nephroureterectomy remains the gold standard treatment for high-risk upper tract urothelial carcinoma. The procedure is subdivided into six main steps: nephrectomy, ureterectomy, bladder cuff excision, cystorrhaphy, template-based lymph node dissection, and perioperative instillation of chemotherapy. Crucial in performing radical nephroureterectomy is successful management of the distal ureter and bladder cuff. Improper, inadequate, or incomplete bladder cuff excision can lead to worse oncologic outcomes and inferior cancer-specific survival. Throughout the years, open, laparoscopic, endoscopic, and robotic approaches have all been reported in performing bladder cuff excision during radical nephroureterectomy. The procedure can be accomplished via an extravesical, intravesical or transvesical manner. Each approach has distinct advantages and disadvantages. The robotic approach offers inherent advantages including improved dexterity, range of motion, and visualization. Critical to choosing an approach, however, is surgeon experience and comfort level. To date, no data suggests superiority of one approach over another. Sound oncologic principles must be adhered to when performing radical nephroureterectomy and include (I) adequate bladder cuff excision, (II) lymphadenectomy, (III) no complications and (IV) negative surgical margins, and (V) perioperative instillation of chemotherapeutic agent. Herein, we describe the various approaches in performing a bladder cuff excision and provide technical commentary supporting the advantages and disadvantages of each technique.