Abstract

BackgroundThe 2016 World Health Organization (WHO) revised classification criteria for the diagnosis of polycythemia vera (PV) allows for an earlier detection of masked PV. The literature is scarce about the clinical uptake of new diagnostic algorithms for PV. In a cohort of Canadian hematologists, we aimed to identify how the revised 2016 WHO diagnostic criteria of PV are being incorporated into hematology practice, and if the treatment of PV is comparable to the approaches outlined by the Canadian Myeloproliferative Neoplasm Group. Materials and MethodsA cross-sectional survey of practicing Canadian hematologists/oncologists was distributed to active members of the Canadian Hematology Society using an online survey-distributing website. Univariate and multivariate analysis was performed. ResultsThe survey was completed by 86 respondents in total. Only type of practice was associated with respondents offering aspirin to all patients with PV (P = .0009). Respondents who were aware of the Canadian Myeloproliferative Neoplasm Group guidelines were more likely to phlebotomize patients to a target hematocrit of < 45% irrespective of gender (P = .042). Younger practitioners were more likely to use age over 60 years as an indication for initiating cytoreductive therapy (P = .0006). Most (85.3%) respondents would recommend indefinite anticoagulation in patients with PV who developed unprovoked venous thromboembolism. ConclusionThe survey confirmed that heterogeneity of practice in diagnosis and management of PV among Canadian hematologists exists, suggesting that targeted education in specific segments of the PV treatment providers may result in wider adoption of the guidelines and diagnostic criteria.

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.