Abstract
BackgroundNon-urgent emergency department (ED) attendances are common among children. Primary care management may not only be more clinically appropriate, but may also improve patient experience and be more cost-effective.AimTo determine the impact on admissions, waiting times, antibiotic prescribing, and treatment costs of integrating a GP into a paediatric ED.Design and settingRetrospective cohort study explored non-urgent ED presentations in a paediatric ED in north-west England.MethodFrom 1 October 2015 to 30 September 2017, a GP was situated in the ED from 2.00 pm until 10.00 pm, 7 days a week. All children triaged as ‘green’ using the Manchester Triage System (non-urgent) were considered to be ‘GP appropriate’. In cases of GP non-availability, children considered non-urgent were managed by ED staff. Clinical and operational outcomes, as well as the healthcare costs of children managed by GPs and ED staff across the same timeframe over a 2-year period were compared.ResultsOf 115 000 children attending the ED over the study period, a complete set of data were available for 13 099 categorised as ‘GP appropriate’; of these, 8404 (64.2%) were managed by GPs and 4695 (35.8%) by ED staff. Median duration of ED stay was 39 min (interquartile range [IQR] 16–108 min) in the GP group and 165 min (IQR 104–222 min) in the ED group (P<0.001). Children in the GP group were less likely to be admitted as inpatients (odds ratio [OR] 0.16; 95% confidence interval [CI] = 0.13 to 0.20) and less likely to wait >4 hours before being admitted or discharged (OR 0.11; 95% CI = 0.08 to 0.13), but were more likely to receive antibiotics (OR 1.42; 95% CI = 1.27 to 1.58). Treatment costs were 18.4% lower in the group managed by the GP (P<0.0001).ConclusionGiven the rising demand for children’s emergency services, GP in ED care models may improve the management of non-urgent ED presentations. However, further research that incorporates causative study designs is required.
Highlights
The total number of visits to emergency departments (EDs) in England exceeded 24 million in 20181 and has risen by 42% since 2008,2 with over two-thirds of attendances taking place without GP referral or transfer by ambulance.[3]
Children in the GP group were less likely to be admitted as inpatients and less likely to wait >4 hours before being admitted or discharged, but were more likely to receive antibiotics
The benefits of introducing GPs into EDs for managing non-urgent cases are well documented and include increased patient satisfaction,[18,19,20] reduced waiting times,[19] and reductions in invasive examinations,[21] it is unclear whether this represents an efficient use of NHS resources, with the only economic analysis to date taking place in 1996.22 Building on the authors’ previous findings from a 6-month pilot scheme of the initiative,[19] which assessed clinical and process outcomes, this retrospective observational study, conducted in one of Europe’s largest and busiest specialist paediatric EDs, assesses the impact of a primary care service located in an ED on waiting times, admissions, antibiotic prescribing rates, and healthcare costs
Summary
Of 115 000 children attending the ED over the study period, a complete set of data were available for 13 099 categorised as ‘GP appropriate’; of these, 8404 (64.2%) were managed by GPs and 4695 (35.8%) by ED staff. Median duration of ED stay was 39 min (interquartile range [IQR] 16–108 min) in the GP group and 165 min (IQR 104–222 min) in the ED group (P4 hours before being admitted or discharged (OR 0.11; 95% CI = 0.08 to 0.13), but were more likely to receive antibiotics (OR 1.42; 95% CI = 1.27 to 1.58). Treatment costs were 18.4% lower in the group managed by the GP (P
Sign-in/Register to view highlights & summary Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Schedule a callMore From: The British journal of general practice : the journal of the Royal College of General Practitioners
Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.
