Management of Nondiagnostic Thyroid Fine-Needle Aspiration Biopsy: Survey of Endocrinologists

Abstract

To evaluate the approach of endocrinologists in the setting of nondiagnostic thyroid fine-needle aspiration (FNA) biopsies. In 2002, we surveyed physicians attending the national annual meetings of the American Association of Clinical Endocrinologists and the Endocrine Society of North America, using a 13-item questionnaire. The responses were tallied and analyzed. Of the 143 respondents, 139 were endocrinologists, with a male:female ratio of 2.5:1. Most respondents were involved in a medical practice in North America, but Europe, Asia, New Zealand, and Australia were also represented. Of those performing thyroid FNA biopsy, 31% used thyroid ultrasound guidance. Among the survey respondents, 16%, 49%, 20%, and 15% performed less than 2, 2 to 5, 6 to 10, and more than 10 thyroid FNA biopsies per month, respectively. Among the respondents, 13.5%, 44%, 28.5%, 10%, and 4% had non-diagnostic rates of less than 5%, 5 to 10%, 11 to 20%, 21 to 30%, and more than 30%, respectively. The approach of the respondents to an initially nondiagnostic FNA was repeated FNA biopsy in 87%, observation in 7%, levothyroxine suppression in 4%, and thyroid scintigraphy in 2%. Respondents believed that the most cost-effective approach in a patient with nondiagnostic FNA was repeated biopsy (82%), monitoring the size of the thyroid nodule (17%), and surgical referral (<1%). No one was willing to repeat the thyroid biopsy more than three times. On the basis of findings in our survey, most endocrinologists repeat thyroid FNA at least once when confronted with a nondiagnostic result. No published studies have demonstrated the cost-effectiveness of this approach versus proceeding to surgical intervention or observation. We hope that this survey will encourage further studies on this issue.