Management of Little Finger Metacarpal Fractures: A Meta-Analysis of the Current Evidence.

Abstract

Background: The little finger metacarpal neck fracture, also known as boxer's fracture, is a commonly encountered upper limb fracture in orthopaedics. There are multiple ways of managing this fracture, ranging from immediate mobilization to rigid internal fixation. However, there is still a lack of consensus on the best management option. The aim of this study is to review all comparative studies, either randomized trial or cohort studies, on little finger metacarpal neck fracture management, meta-analyze the radiological and functional outcome between conservative and operative management. Methods: A systematic search of the literature was conducted between year 1987 to 2018 on MEDLINE and EMBASE. To be included, studies needed to have shown comparison between conservative against operative management, assessing the radiological (palmar angulation) and the patient reported functional outcomes. The data were pooled using fixed-effect method. The methodology was adapted from the Cochrane Handbook for Systematic Review of Interventions and compliant with the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PROSPERO CRD42018099168). Results: 5 full papers were included in our study. Our meta-analysis showed that compared to operative management, conservative management report worse radiological palmar angulation at follow-up; but equivalent functional outcome in terms of Quick-DASH and grip strength. Conservative studies also showed fewer mean days off in comparison to operative management. Conservative management also showed equivalent Total Active Motion (TAM) and Visual Analogue Score for Pain (VAS), but some studies had insufficient data to be pooled. Conclusions: Regardless of palmar angulation, conservative treatment of little finger metacarpal neck fracture provides an equivalent functional outcome to surgical intervention with an earlier return to work and no risk of surgical complications. Larger, randomised controlled trials are required.