Abstract
Introduction Follicular thyroid carcinoma (FTC) includes a spectrum of neoplasms with varying propensity for metastasis. The aim of this study is to describe outcomes for FTC following multimodality treatment, with particular reference to the degree of capsular and vascular invasion and to recommend a rational management approach based on these characteristics. Methods Patients with histologically confirmed FTC were identified from a prospectively maintained database. Details of intervention and long-term outcomes were obtained. Outcomes were compared between patients with minimally invasive follicular carcinoma (MI FTC) without vascular invasion (Group 1); angioinvasive MI FTC (Group 2); and those with widely invasive FTC (Group 3). Results Between May 1983 and December 2008, 124 patients with FTC were identified. The overall disease-free survival rate was 85% at a median of 40 months follow-up. Disease-free survival was 97%, 81% and 46%, respectively, in Groups 1, 2 and 3, and significantly different between groups ( p < 0.001). Thirteen patients in this series developed distant metastases including 2 in Group 1 and 6 in Group 2. Only patients <45 years of age with MI FTC and no vascular invasion had 100% disease-free survival. After multivariate linear regression, age ( p = 0.03) and the presence of vascular invasion ( p = 0.03) were the most powerful predictors of distant metastasis. Conclusions Survival is improved in those with minimally invasive compared with widely invasive FTC. In patients <45 years with MI FTC without vascular invasion, hemithyroidectomy may be adequate treatment. All other patients with FTC should undergo total thyroidectomy and radioactive iodine ablation.
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.