Abstract

Objective: To determine if below-elbow casts are as effective as above-elbow casts in the treatment of the distal third closed forearm fractures in children.
 Materials and Methods: This was a prospective comparative study and was conducted at orthopaedic department of Liaquat University of Medical and Health Sciences (LUMHS). Children 4 to 12 years of age who presented to, distal 1/3rd fractures of the forearm were randomized in order to manage with either an above-elbow or below-elbow cast after closed reduction under fluoroscopic guidance. Radiographic analysis was done for angulation and displacement at the injury time, following reduction, and at subsequent intervals of follow-up. At the fracture level, the cast index for evaluating the cast moulding quality was assessed from the post-reduction radiographs. Variations between post-reduction and final values for displacement and angulation, the range of motion of elbow, forearm and wrists and cast indices between the two groups were compared.
 Results: Of total 50 study subjects, 26 underwent above-elbow cast and 24 subjects underwent below-elbow cast techniques. Mean age of above-elbow cast group patients was 9.42 year and the mean age in of below-elbow cast group patients was 9.13 years. 15 male and 11 female patients were present in above-elbow cast group; 14 male and 10 female patients were present in below-elbow cast group. The mean cast index of above-elbow cast group was 0.71 and the mean cast index of below-elbow cast was 0.70. In terms of patient demographics, injury mechanism, characteristics of initial fracture, cast index or shift in displacement and angulation during treatment, no significant variances were observed between both groups. In above-elbow cast group, the mean elbow arc of motion on cast removal at six weeks was only 78° compared to 141.6° in below-elbow cast group. There was a significant decline in arc of motion of elbow joint in above-elbow cast group compared to below-elbow cast group in six weeks which became normal at final follow-up in three months. The complication rates in both the groups were similar.
 Conclusion: Below-elbow cast is the safe reliable and cost-effective method of cast immobilization in distal third forearm fractures in the children of 4 to 12 years of age.

Highlights

  • Forearm fractures are the commonest fractures of long bone in children [1]

  • Mean age of above-elbow cast group patients was 9.42 year and the mean age in of below-elbow cast group patients was 9.13 years. 15 male and 11 female patients were present in above-elbow cast group; 14 male and 10 female patients were present in belowelbow cast group

  • There was a significant decline in arc of motion of elbow joint in above-elbow cast group compared to below-elbow cast group in six weeks which became normal at final follow-up in three months

Read more

Summary

Introduction

Forearm fractures are the commonest fractures of long bone in children [1]. The commonest fracture site in the forearm is the distal part of the ulna and radius [2]. Blount reported that about 75% of forearm fractures take place in the distal 3rd of the forearm [3] Such fractures were observed to be 3 times more prevalent among boys; though, this proportion may be altered by growing involvement in sports activities by girls at a younger age. The distal radius metaphysis is by far the most prominent site of fracturing of the forearm among adolescents and children Most generally, these take place among boys in non-dominant arm. Whether the below-elbow cast (or short arm cast) or above-elbow cast is safer for immobilization following using closed reduction technique in fractures of distal forearm among children is controversial. No study has been conducted on comparing the outcome of above-elbow cast and below-elbow cast to immobilize distal 1/ 3rd forearm fractures in children after closed reduction in LUMHS till now. The aim of our study is to analyze clinical and radiological results of children with distal third forearm fractures immobilized with both the above- elbow and the short arm casts after closed reduction to determine if short arm cast is as effective as above-elbow cast

Methods
Results
Discussion
Conclusion
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call