Abstract

1) To assess the methodological quality of clinical practice guidelines (CPGs) associated with cardiovascular disease (CVD) in women with premature ovarian insufficiency (POI); 2) to formulate an algorithm to foster the implementation of guidelines by clinicians. A systematic search for CPGs in English and Chinese languages published between 2015 and 2020 was conducted. Assessment was conducted by two reviewers respectively via the Appraisal of Guidelines for Research and Evaluation II instrument. The interappraisal agreement was evaluated. Recommendations pertaining to the management of CVD in women with POI were extracted from high-score CPGs and developed into an algorithm, which was refined on the basis of expert feedback. A total of 14 CPGs were included. Three CPGs were evaluated as "high quality," with five "average" and six considered "low quality." The consistency of agreement between reviewers was considered as substantial agreement to almost perfect agreement (0.72-0.90). The algorithm consisted of three categories: initial evaluation, management, and subsequent monitoring of CVD in POI. Only "management" had recommendations from all three high-quality CPGs. The overall methodological quality of most CPGs regarding CVD in women with POI is moderate to poor. A management algorithm with a clear implementation strategy was developed from high-scoring CPGs. Further research is needed to provide evidence-based health care in this field.

Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call