Abstract

BackgroundManagement of secretions in children with cerebral palsy is often problematic due to severe deformation of the rib cage, impaired cough, and patients’inability to collaborate with chest physiotherapy. Assessing the effectiveness of different methods and techniques of secretion clearance is hampered by the lack of direct outcome measures and by limited patient cooperation.This observational study was planned to evaluate the efficacy of Free Aspire, a device that utilizes a special method to remove secretions from the bronchial tree in hypersecretive patients.Case presentationCerebral palsy patients were selected who had experienced more than 3 episodes of respiratory exacerbations in the latest year despite therapeutic optimization (including bronchial clearance techniques) and who had received at least one antibiotic course or underwent at least one access to the Emergency Room (ER) or admission to hospital in the 6 months prior to the study. Patients with congestive heart failure or contraindications for Free Aspire were excluded. We prospectively enrolled 8 patients (mean age 8.25 ± 6.11 years) who had been using in the past techniques for clearance secretions different from Free Aspire.The treatment with Free Aspire consisted of at least two 20-min sessions per day. The observational study period was 18 months.In the 6 months prior to start the treatment (T0), patients had a mean number of 4.0 ± 2.23 visits from the primary care pediatrician (PCP), spent 14 ± 20 days in hospital, and received antibiotics for 35 ± 17 days. After the first 6 months of treatment (T1), they had 1.7 ± 0.73 PCP visits, no days spent in hospital, and 9.75 ± 10.4 days of antibiotic therapy. At 12 months of treatment (T2), PCP visits were 1.7 ± 0.70, days in hospital 1.12 ± 0.3, and days of antibiotics 10.25 ± 10. At 18 months of treatment (T3) no hospitalizations had occurred, PCP visits were 0.25 ± 0.70, and days of antibiotic therapy 4.8 ± 12.62. The technique proved to be safe and well tolerated.ConclusionOur findings show that Free Aspire for bronchial secretion clearance in cerebral palsy patients with limited capacity to collaborate is safe and effective in reducing the impact of respiratory exacerbations in terms of number of PCP visits, days spent in hospital, and days of antibiotic therapy; its regular use maintains this effect in time.

Highlights

  • Management of secretions in children with cerebral palsy is often problematic due to severe deformation of the rib cage, impaired cough, and patients’inability to collaborate with chest physiotherapy

  • Our findings show that Free Aspire for bronchial secretion clearance in cerebral palsy patients with limited capacity to collaborate is safe and effective in reducing the impact of respiratory exacerbations in terms of number of primary care pediatrician (PCP) visits, days spent in hospital, and days of antibiotic therapy; its regular use maintains this effect in time

  • To determine whether Free Aspire is safe and well tolerated and can facilitate mucociliary clearance and improve respiratory health in the long term, we prospectively studied pediatric patients with Cerebral palsy (CP) and severe lung impairment due to retention of bronchial secretions

Read more

Summary

Conclusion

It can be concluded that the application of Free Aspire to improve the bronchial secretion clearance in non-collaborating patients with CP, is feasible and effective in reducing respiratory complications and exacerbations, as well as the utilization of healthcare resources (PCP visits, days of hospitalization, need for antibiotics). Authors’ contributions Giancarlo Garuti study design, drafted and revised the manuscript. Elisa Verucchi study design, drafted and revised the manuscript. Isabella Fanelli study design, drafted and revised the manuscript. Michele Giovannini study design, drafted and revised the manuscript. Author details 1Pneumology Unit, Santa Maria Bianca Hospital, via Fogazzaro 1, Mirandola (MO), 41025 Modena, Italy. Sebastiano Hospital, Correggio (RE), and UILDM, Reggio Emilia, Italy

Background
Findings
Discussion
Full Text
Paper version not known

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.