Abstract
Appendiceal neuroendocrine tumors (ANETs) are rare neoplasms usually discovered incidentally during appendectomy. ANETs < 2cm were thought to have no metastatic potential, and this dogma has driven management. Our aim is to evaluate the metastatic potential of ANETs < 2cm. A retrospective review was performed in a series of patients with ANETs who presented to our tertiary referral center from 1998 to 2019. Demographics, tumor characteristics, treatment, and clinical outcomes were evaluated. In total, 114 patients were included. Median follow-up was 3.3years (range, 21days-15years). At last follow-up, 34 (30%) patients had positive regional lymph nodes and 20 (18%) patients had metastatic disease. Of the 20 patients with metastatic disease, 11 (55%) had primary ANETs < 2cm. Patient age > 40years at diagnosis and ANETs with serosal invasion, lymphovascular invasion, intermediate tumor grade, or positive lymph nodes were features significantly more likely to present with metastatic disease. We found no difference in the rate of lymph node positivity, metastatic disease, or overall survival when patients were stratified by tumor size or type of resection (appendectomy vs. right hemicolectomy). On multivariate analysis, patients with metastatic disease at diagnosis had worse overall survival (HR = 24.4, p = 0.008). In our cohort, tumor size was not a significant risk factor for metastatic disease or worse outcome as many patients with ANETs < 2cm developed metastatic disease. Appendectomy alone was sufficient surgical management for most ANETs. Patients with risk factors for metastatic disease, regardless of primary ANET size, should be evaluated thoroughly and counseled for further management and surveillance.
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.