Abstract
O0F course it will be understood that I am writing as an individual and not in any sense as a representative of the Coal Commission. There are some points at which I should be inclined to go further than the Commission has gone in recommending the definite encouragement of leadership through the aid of public agencies. It seems to me that continuous public inquiry and publicity are needed to keep abreast of conditions in coal mining with which the public is concerned. A public agency so organized that it could carry on wise investigation and furnish proper publicity at all times, and in addition could in emergencies either extend its scope to include mediation or proclaim the facts upon which other mediative agencies would be set in motion, would serve a desirable and necessary public purpose. I realize that this suggestion may seem to look in the direction of more
Sign-in/Register to access full text options 
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Schedule a callMore From: The ANNALS of the American Academy of Political and Social Science
Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.
