Abstract

BackgroundThe risk of lawsuits causes surgeons stress and is associated with defensive medicine. It is possible that some surgeons withdraw from surgery because of malpractice lawsuits, although the actual impact of lawsuits is not clear. This study evaluated changes in work and medical practices involved in lawsuits, as well as support they receive. Materials and methodsA total of 115 surgeons who had been involved in lawsuits in Japan were eligible to participate. Participants were surveyed about changes in work because of lawsuits, the influence of lawsuits on medical care, defensive medicine, and their opinions on support they received. ResultsA total of 30 surveys were collected. Six surgeons changed work: five had lost their lawsuits and the remaining one had a settlement. Surgeons felt that lawsuits imposed a time burden (100%) and caused emotional strain (96%). Surgeons made a number of conscious changes to their medical care after lawsuits, including over care (27%) and a hesitation to use high-risk treatments (39%). They had positive opinions of support they received from the legal counsel (89%), the hospital director (73%), supervisors (65%), and colleagues (57%). Surgeons who changed work were significantly more likely to engage in defensive medicine, including over care and hesitation, than those who had not changed work. Support from the legal counsel was negatively correlated with over care and hesitation. ConclusionsGiven the significant influence of lawsuits on surgeons' practice, medical institutions should provide support to surgeons. Future research is needed to confirm whether legal counsel may prevent defensive medicine.

Full Text
Paper version not known

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.