Abstract

The ‘female nutrition’ hypothesis proposes that food provided by males during incubation is an important energy source for females in bird species in which females alone incubate. Females should be able to communicate their needs through begging signals to mates and males may compensate for the energetic limitations of females through their feeding visits, owing to their overlapping reproductive interests. To test whether female begging during incubation is an honest signal of energetic need and whether mates respond to it we experimentally handicapped female pied flycatchers at the beginning of incubation by clipping two primary flight feathers on each wing. Experimental manipulation led females to intensify begging displays arising from condition impairment and males accordingly increased their incubation feeding rates. Female begging intensity explained more than half of the variation in male incubation feeding rate, thereby showing that female nutrition is the main factor explaining male incubation feeding. Moreover, handicapped females consumed a higher proportion of male food deliveries during the first few days after hatching and weighed less at the end of the nestling period than control females. Handicapping had no influence on female incubation behaviour, hatching and breeding success, nestling and male condition or female nestling provisioning. The provisioning rates of males in the late nestling stage were higher in experimental nests. This is the first experimental study showing that males adjust incubation feeding rates to behavioural displays of need by their mates. The ability of females to modify their begging displays according to need may be an important adaptation that allows females to maintain a good energetic condition during incubation.

Highlights

  • Males of many avian species in which only the female incubates provision their mates during the incubation period (Lifjeld and Slagsvold 1986; Lyon and Montgomerie 1985; Ricklefs 1974)

  • Several studies have demonstrated that higher rates of male incubation feeding to their mates can improve female body condition (Lifjeld and Slagsvold 1986) and increase nest attentiveness by reducing the amount of time the female spends foraging off the nest (Halupka 1994; Leclaire et al 2011; Lloyd et al 2009; Matysioková et al 2011; but see Lifjled & Slagsvold 1989; Matysioková & Remeš 2010; Boulton et al 2010; Stein et al 2010; Moreno and Carlson 1989; Pearse et al 2004; Smith et al 1989; Stein et al 2010) and thereby help to advance hatching (Lyon and Montgomerie 1985; Nilsson and Smith 1988), improve hatching success (Galván and Sanz 2011; Lyon and Montgomerie 1985; Nilsson and Smith 1988) or improve fledgling condition (Lifjeld and Slagsvold 1986; Røskaft 1983). This suggests that incubation feeding has evolved as a behavioural strategy to partly compensate for the energetic limitations of females while incubating (Galván and Sanz 2011)

  • There are probable fitness advantages for the breeding pair derived from male incubation feeding, there may be costs for males induced by intensified foraging activity at an early stage of the season (Leclaire et al 2011; Lifjeld and Slagsvold 1986; Smith et al 1989)

Read more

Summary

Introduction

Males of many avian species in which only the female incubates provision their mates during the incubation period (Lifjeld and Slagsvold 1986; Lyon and Montgomerie 1985; Ricklefs 1974). Male incubation feeding intensity could be more a product of differences in male age, condition and mating strategy than of female nutritional needs (Lifjeld and Slagsvold 1986; 1989; Lifjeld et al 1987)

Methods
Results
Conclusion
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call